Last week, in a
15-0 voting, the United Nations
Security Council approved the
resolution 1546 proposed by the
United States imperialism and its
trusty British ally regarding the
so-called power transfer to
Iraqis, also establishing the
stages and conditions according to
which it will take place. That was
all Bush wanted in a moment when
the occupation forces are placed
under heavy strain, being
relentlessly attacked by a
diversified armed resistance that
is dispersed throughout the
country, in a moment when his
policy of war and military
occupation is being vehemently
condemned by democratic and
anti-imperialist forces all over
the world and by the international
and American public opinion, with
greater intensity after the
atrocities committed in the
hellish prison that is Abu Ghraib
were revealed. Since the nightmare
of defeat began to disquiet Bush
and the ultraconservative group
that leads the government in the
United States, the need to remove
the Iraqi issue from the electoral
scene with the presentation of a
“positive” result has imposed
itself. That is what originated
the plan that now is advanced in
the form of UN Security Council
resolution 1546.
The resolution
was preceded by the creation of a
“temporary government” that will
substitute from June 30 on the
“government council” and succeed
the Provisory Coalition
Authority. But the temporary
government is a counterfeit, an
improvised arrangement, as all its
members are appointed by the
occupation authorities or chosen
as a result of negotiations made
with tribal chiefs and political
leaderships interested in taking
advantage of the new situation
created in Iraq by the war of
aggression and the fall of Saddam
Hussein’s regime. It is enough
saying that the government leader,
Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, is a
long-time ally of the United
States and his connections with
the CIA are well known.
The unanimity
granted to resolution 1546 in the
Security Council was certainly
made possible due to the fact that
the United States ceded in some
issues, especially after France’s
observations and contrapositions.
Those were secondary concessions,
more related to form than to
depth, to process than to content,
and overly characterized by
ambiguity. For instance, it is
affirmed in the text that the
temporary government will be
granted the power to demand
international troops to leave, but
it makes clear that the
“multinational” force led by the
United States will be dismantled
only in January 2006, regardless
of the will of new governors. As
far as the process of transferring
power is concerned, the resolution
establishes a schedule according
to which a national conference
will be called in July to choose
the Consulting Council and promote
elections in January 2005 to elect
a transitory National Assembly,
which will provide a transition
government that will draft the
Constitution and lead the country
to the election of a
constitutional administration in
December 31, 2005. Those are all
superficial and secondary aspects
that are bound to oblivion in the
face of an objectively explosive
situation and the colonialist
appetite of the United States.
But the fact is
that since its approval on June 8,
resolution 1546 has turned into a
campaign flyer to Bush as it is
presented as the democratic
achievement resulting from the
military intervention, now with
the approval of the “international
community”, which finally
“recognized” the United States’
reasons. A repugnant lie.
Resolution 1546
is an indecent document and the
abject capitulation of the
Security Council to an imposition
impinged by imperialism. This is
not the occasion to analyze
intentions. We know that many cast
their votes considering that it is
the reflex of a possible
commitment and also believing that
it would help restore sovereignty
in Iraq. But it is false. On the
contrary, the Security Council
legitimates occupation, which is
prolonged to a dilated term,
creating the illusion that now the
UN will play some role in the
Iraqi crisis and that there is a
legitimate government to lead the
country’s matters. And worse of
all, the resolution consummates
the fraud of turning the
aggressive forces of occupation
under the leadership of the United
States into a “multilateral
force”, granting it the right to
fight resistance and gun down
everyone who does not submit to
the occupation regime.
The
anti-imperialist forces cannot
display an attitude different from
denouncing the UN resolution 1546
as a decoy, as much as it must
fight vigorously against the now
legalized occupation. The wound
opened by the United States’
aggression will keep bleeding; the
chaotic situation that the
imperialist war produced will
hardly turn into normality;
despair and pain caused to immense
portions of the population by the
occupation regime will not be
transformed into hope, comfort and
peace just like magic. The
temporary administration will
always be seen as a puppet
government at the service of the
invader. Patriots will always
target it. The UN blessing will
not change the slightest bit as
long as the character of the
United States occupation or the
colonialist purposes of President
Bush and his ultraconservatives
are concerned. It also will not
diminish the force of the
resistance movement.
The plan that
presented the Middle East
“democratization” during the G-8
meeting, held soon after the
approval of resolution 1546, and
the divulged evidences that the
United States already has a
“contingence” plan with a view to
perform a “government transition”
in Syria are facts that reveal
that the United States’
imperialism will follow the road
of interventionism and aggression
regarding other countries. |